Peer Review Process
SENANDIKA conference submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two reviewers. Reviewers are experts in fields specifically matching the conference topics.
Program Committee members provide the vital link with the profession that makes the conference a success. The reviews help the Executive Committee select which papers to accept and reject. Additionally, your reviews help the authors of papers make their papers and presentations stronger. Finally, your suggestions help the Program Chairs select the outstanding papers.
Archive Access Policy
The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.